你需要的东西，到时候都会有的，
4月10号，骚鸟有篇文章，No Substitute for Victory，文字有些拗口，观点非常明确，有功夫去读一下吧！哈，阿拉的观点你明白吗？绝不踢馆，你不随意惹事生非儿，外界未必非要打你，哈，而臭虫逗你，不理会啊！非要打架，那就打，拼命啊！你不能到处挑事儿，出事儿了想跑？跑不了，说到‘你该有的东西’，哈，就象聊早年怎么出去啊！分文没有！那怎么办呢？哈，人家陈志武给YALE写封信，爷没钱，考托的银子都冇得，耶鲁回信，过来读书吧！哈，
你像阿拉这拨，衣服鞋子都是党的，哈哈，顺美西装就是便宜货了，那你买得起？也是买不起，
我教育小家伙，同时给你做样子，你就踏踏实实读书，读明白了！需要东西的时候，都会有的，这就是人类历史，明白吗？哈，
阿拉那时也是一无所有的，穿党的衣服，哈哈，慢慢你就都有了，今天阿拉也没有那些动辄数千万的软件，需要的时候，就有，
随你读书，提升层面，自然会有其它东西，每个层面有每个层面不同的妞儿，就是随你进步，妞儿都是不一样的，哈，越是底层老虎越追求彩礼，房子，越算计你，明白吗？这是人性，
当然，李爷也斗不过最底层的侉子，哈哈，那种亿万之众你怎么打的过？哈，你离开，就解决了，
不逗笑的，逐步打扮好了，逐步提高，这个过程千万不可以成为郭先生，哈哈，就象网络之于李爷，我就问你几句，你玩什么的啊？哈哈，这孙子就会跑，
还是谈关爱自己，真的，也许潮水快到了，比如失业你怎么办？长期失业你怎么办？当然，李爷明白，最终的出路就是革命，党也可以领带底层人民再次革命啊！哈哈，这是民族宿命，不可以笑啊！
本帖最后由 迷茫的维修 于 2024-4-13 13:58 编辑
新冷战
Biden’s diplomats pulled longtime allies and newer partners closer together. They organized the first summits of the Quad, or Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, bringing together the leaders of Australia, India, Japan, and the United States, and convened high-profile trilateral summits with the leaders of Japan and South Korea. Biden also unveiled AUKUS, a defense pact among Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. 上月开始锻炼，俯卧撑方面，开始是每天做50个，最近每天不低于100个。今天休息，上午做了140个，中午突然想看看能不能做300个，刚才总算做完了。人还是得有目标，努力去实现 除了胜利我们已无路可退 Amid a presidency beset by failures of deterrence—in Afghanistan, Ukraine, and the Middle East—the Biden administration’s China policy has stood out as a relative bright spot. The administration has strengthened U.S. alliances in Asia, restricted Chinese access to critical U.S. technologies, and endorsed the bipartisan mood for competition. Yet the administration is squandering these early gains by falling into a familiar trap: prioritizing a short-term thaw with China’s leaders at the expense of a long-term victory over their malevolent strategy. The Biden team’s policy of “managing competition” with Beijing risks emphasizing processes over outcomes, bilateral stability at the expense of global security, and diplomatic initiatives that aim for cooperation but generate only complacency.
The United States shouldn’t manage the competition with China; it should win it. Beijing is pursuing a raft of global initiatives designed to disintegrate the West and usher in an antidemocratic order. It is underwriting expansionist dictatorships in Russia, Iran, North Korea, and Venezuela. It has more than doubled its nuclear arsenal since 2020 and is building up its conventional forces faster than any country has since World War II. These actions show that China isn’t aiming for a stalemate. Neither should America.
What would winning look like? China’s communist rulers would give up trying to prevail in a hot or cold conflict with the United States and its friends. And the Chinese people—from ruling elites to everyday citizens—would find inspiration to explore new models of development and governance that don’t rely on repression at home and compulsive hostility abroad. 哈哈，那不是老麦的名言吗，俺还能背下来:' I know war, few others who now live know it, in war there's no substitute for victory. ' 还能回味起老麦低沉深长的语气，上学时听过他的国会演讲和西点演讲的音频
页:
[1]